The Next Pandemic

Warning: This article mentions COVID-19. To better protect yourself from government misinformation, please visit the Frontline Pedia.

Major pharmaceutical companies announced in March they are testing bird flu vaccines on humans “just in case”.

Reuters reported that GSK, Moderna and CSL Seqirus are either developing or already testing vaccines for the newest avian flu outbreak, classified as H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b. The outbreak has reportedly “killed record numbers of birds and mammals” and, while the risk of transmission to humans is admittedly low, the vaccine makers said they were nevertheless preparing shots for people.

On Tuesday, mainstream media outlets began to raise the alarm about two poultry workers in the UK who have contracted H5N1.

“Bird flu could become the next human pandemic – and politicians aren’t paying attention,” read an op-ed published in The Guardian by Devi Sridhar, who serves on the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on the Health Industry. In 2018 Sridhar “predicted” a virus of animal origin would travel from China to the UK. She advocated for stronger UK lockdown measures and promotes testing as the way to "preserve your economy." .

“This is a disease with an estimated 50-60% fatality rate in humans, including children,” wrote Sridhar.

Sridhar is not the only globalist warning that the next pandemic will target children.

In June 2022 Joe Biden announced there will be another pandemic, though he did not go into details. He made the remark while assuring Americans his administration is working to provide enough vaccines for small children. 

“We’ll get through at least this year,” Biden began, adding, “We do need more money. But we don’t just need more money for vaccines for children, eventually. We need more money to plan for the second pandemic. There’s going to be another pandemic.” 

In October the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation co-hosted a pandemic simulation exercise named Catastrophic Contagion. The simulation was attended by Gates himself along with 13 other participants, including senior public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola, Liberia, Singapore, India and Germany.  

Participants had to react to a fictional pandemic set in the future which originated in a certain point of the globe and spread around the world. Unlike COVID-19, which in the main was not a threat to children and young people, Catastrophic Contagion engineered a pandemic that was more lethal and targeted those populations specifically.  

In January, Gates warned that a new pandemic is afoot which may be “man-made” and “far more brutal”. He blamed the failed response to COVID-19 in part on “a particularly dangerous form of populism” whose connection to US healthcare is “a bit concerning” and praised authoritarian responses like Australia’s and China’s.

Famed author and neuroscientist Sam Harris earlier this year lamented that the COVID-19 pandemic did not target children because that enabled “vaccine skepticism”.

I mean, just think about—leave COVID exactly as it is, but just make it preferentially dangerous to children rather than to old people, right? You just flip that around, the variable of age. If kids were dying by the hundreds of thousands from COVID at a rate of whatever it was, you know, one percents, say, but it was pretty much all kids – we would have had a very different experience, right? And the patience, there would have been no f*cking patience for vaccine skepticism, right? And everyone would have recognized that this is not ‘my body, my choice’, this is ‘you’re not gonna kill my kids with your ignorance’, right?

Harris went on to say that society was “unlucky” that the virus did not target children.

Countries are currently negotiating with the World Health Organization (WHO) on a “Pandemic Accord” that will bind all participating nations under the WHO’s authority for the next pandemic.

The agreement requires countries to adopt a One Health approach to healthcare which ties human health to climate change.

“The Parties, recognizing that the majority of emerging infectious diseases and pandemics are caused by zoonotic pathogens, commit . . . to promote and implement a One Health approach that is coherent, integrated, coordinated and collaborative among all relevant actors, with the application of existing instruments and initiatives,” says the accord.

The stated pretext of One Health claims that because pandemic diseases are zoonotic and spread from animals to humans, human health must be looked at in the context of animals and the environment or what is called the “human-animal-environment interface”.

While it has been confirmed that the coronavirus was not a zoonotic disease, the WHO and other globalist governments have insisted it was spread from bats to humans, laying the groundwork for One Health. If diseases come from animals, humans must stop eating meat which will reduce carbon emissions and fight climate change. 

The WHO’s Pandemic Accord therefore requires governments to “address the drivers of the emergence and re-emergence of disease at the human-animal-environment interface, including but not limited to climate change, land use change, wildlife trade, desertification and antimicrobial resistance.”

The agreement reiterates elsewhere that countries must “commit to strengthen synergies with other existing relevant instruments that address the drivers of pandemics, such as climate change, biodiversity loss, ecosystem degradation and increased risks at the human-animal-environment interface due to human activities.”

Governments are required to coordinate One Health–based activities with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), and the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), which together form the One Health Quadripartite.

The WHO’s One Health approach has been endorsed by the World Economic Forum (WEF), which praised the ideology’s focus on climate change:

We will have a better chance of suppressing infectious diseases only if we adopt what the WHO calls a One Health approach and integrate predictive modelling and surveillance used in both infectious disease control and climate change.

One Health has already started making its way into US legislation. In December, Congress quietly passed the Advancing Emergency Preparedness Through One Health Act (HR 2061/S 681) which commissions the establishment of a One Health program. The heads of federal agencies such as the CDC, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense and others are ordered to submit a proposal for a One Health Framework to Congress within one year.

The Act says the first goal of the One Health Program is to prevent zoonotic diseases, such as avian flu, which can only be done by focusing more on the environment and agriculture. The bill’s authors worry that zoonotic disease outbreaks may cause egg shortages which can in turn affect vaccine production.

“Public health preparedness depends on agriculture in a variety of ways,” reads the bill. “For example, a wide range of vaccines, including those for influenza, yellow fever, rabies, and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), are primarily cultivated in poultry eggs. Egg shortages resulting from zoonotic disease outbreaks could impose serious risks to vaccine manufacturing efforts."

It is therefore no surprise that the US lead negotiator for the WHO’s Pandemic Accord has pledged the Biden administration’s commitment to the agreement.

“The United States is committed to the Pandemic Accord, to form a major component of the global health architecture for generations to come,” said Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto in a statement.