Scientists talk government mind control and censorship at Tokyo freedom conference
Independent scientific experts from around the world last week converged on Tokyo for the sixth annual International Crisis Summit (ICS). The ICS, born in the wake of government COVID-19 mandates, often focuses on medicine, censorship, and freedom.
This year, dozens of VIPs — mostly physicians, but also including academics, historians, and at least one politician — shared scientific data on vaccines and discussed the epidemic of increasingly tyrannical governments.
The ruse of democracy
On Thursday, Member of the European Parliament Christine Anderson spoke to attendees about her experience growing up in Western Germany. She noticed how, when the Soviet Union fell in the 1990s, it ended the public competition between the East and West. With no more reason to win public opinion, Anderson said, Western governments soon began to drop the ruse of democracy and started to become more comfortable eroding the freedom of their citizens.
Government mind control
Anderson was followed by Jason Christoff, a Canadian behavioral modification expert and psychological researcher. Christoff explained what he called “the three pillars” of government mind control.
The first pillar is fear. When humans experience fear, it routes blood and electrical activity away from the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for reasoning and decision-making. Governments use fear to disarm the ability of their populations to reason and make decisions in their own interests.
The second pillar is repetition. Once fear has taken hold, citizens are more receptive to government information. When they are exposed to the propaganda repeatedly, they come to adopt it as their own beliefs. Christoff said this is why, in the years leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic, citizens were repeatedly exposed to frightening content about apocalyptic pandemics such as the film Contagion, which closely resembled COVID-19.
The third pillar is confusion. Christoff explained that confused brains will more quickly adapt to the hive mind and abandon critical thought. This, he said, is why governments sow confusion with conflicting messages, such as the false positives yielded by PCR tests.
Censorship in science
Dr. Panagis Polykretis, a Greek researcher, discussed the censorship infecting the scientific establishment. One of the main methods of scientific censorship, he said, is the retraction of, and refusal to publish, controversial articles and studies by scientific journals. Polykretis, who studied the detrimental effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, said he had to submit a paper 10 times before it was finally published. In one journal, a note says that no editor wanted to review the article.
“No one wants to handle a hot potato” in the science establishment, he said.
The four-day ICS conference ended on Saturday.
