Red Cross says blood from mRNA recipients is safe. What does the science say?

Concerns dismissed as misinformation

Bills in Montana and Connecticut to protect people from receiving transfusions of blood tainted with the COVID shots have already failed to pass. Legislators in Wyoming are soon to rule on the same issue, with the usual cast of organizations ranged against giving people the option of knowing the source of blood donations.

The Red Cross, like the FDA, CDC, and other institutions, continues to insist that the shots do not taint blood in any way, obviating any need to know whether the donor received the jab. 

Amid ongoing misinformation about COVID-19 vaccinations and blood donation, America’s Blood Centers, the Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB), and the American Red Cross reiterate the safety of America’s blood supply and assure the public that vaccines do not pose a risk to patients receiving blood transfusions.

Blood donations from individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccine .. are safe for transfusion … vaccine components themselves do not replicate through blood transfusions or alter a blood recipient’s DNA.

… there is no scientific evidence that demonstrates adverse outcomes from the transfusions of blood products collected from vaccinated donors and, therefore, no medical reason to distinguish or separate blood donations from individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccination.

No evidence of risk—because none was looked for?

It is perhaps noteworthy that the Red Cross did not link to a single study that backs up even one of its assertions. An article on the AABB website does make reference to one study and claims that it shows that blood from injected donors is safe; however, this is a retrospective cohort study, not a randomized controlled study—furthermore, the raw data of the study results are not open to the public.

It is also interesting to note that the Red Cross and the others do not attempt to claim that there is no actual difference between the blood of someone who had the shots and someone who didn’t. In fact, studies began showing differences several years ago, as Frontline News has covered. Since then, the evidence has only mounted in favor of significant differences—extremely concerning differences.

Spike proteins hang around for up to half a year (or forever?)

The first recent study of note in this area was conducted in Italy and set out to examine the possibility of detecting the spike protein, from the shots, in the blood. The researchers used mass spectrometry, after introducing trypsin to blood samples, in order to distinguish artificial spike protein from the shots from spike protein from the COVID virus itself. They discovered that artificial spike protein could be found in the blood for as long as 187 days—over half a year—following the second shot.

The researchers suggested three reasons why this might be occurring (leaning toward an explanation that involves the spike proteins being absorbed into the gut), all of which entail a potentially infinite cycle of reproduction of spike proteins in the body.

Four biomarkers tell the story

The second recent study, conducted in Germany, investigated biomarkers in the blood of people who had received the shots, in order to find out whether there were any differences between people who had visible vaccine injury and those who appeared to have escaped unscathed.

The researchers found clinically significant differences in four separate biomarkers, up to six months post-injection (when the study ended).

Everyone injected is affected, not just the “vaccine-injured”

Furthermore, while the biomarkers of those visibly harmed by the shots were abnormal, those of people who appeared to have suffered no ill-effects were also not what would be expected following “regular vaccination.”

A study of the blood of those who appeared unharmed revealed that, following the shots, their inflammation markers dropped and normal immune system functioning “ramped down,” apparently in order to take into account, or balance out, the inflammation caused by the shots. 

By contrast, in those visibly harmed by the shots (who, in this study, suffered primarily from chronic fatigue and dysautonomia), the immune system had not adjusted to the inflammation provoked by the shots, leading to an exaggerated immune response.

As the researchers stated, in apparently healthy people following mRNA injection, 

… the repertoire of receptor antibodies involved in cardiovascular regulation and immune homeostasis undergoes long-term adjustment following SARS-CoV-2-mRNA vaccination

The above adjustment seems blunted, absent, or even inversed in persons who present clinical phenotypes of PACVS [shot injury] after SARS-CoV-2-mRNA vaccination. [Emphases added.]

In other words, even six months, and potentially years, following injection, the body is still dealing with the aftermath, no matter how healthy the person appears.

According to Dr. Been of the FLCCC (Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance), this means that the shots are altering people’s immune profile in the long-term:

The mRNA vaccine is causing a long-term immune system profile change, for which the body then adjusts itself, and that is a thing to be concerned about.

Is the Red Cross quietly following up?

As noted, the Red Cross continues to insist that having received the shots is no impediment to donating blood safely. However, its safety protocols contain a curious condition: Anyone who has received the shots should, at the time of blood donation, state which type it was:

If you’ve received a COVID-19 vaccine, you’ll need to provide the manufacturer name when you come to donate.

Frontline News contacted the Red Cross asking what, if anything, is done with this information subsequent to donation, and whether there is any follow-up on the welfare of the blood recipients with respect to the COVID “vaccine” status of their donors. No reply was immediately forthcoming.