New survey shows low COVID hospitalizations among unvaccinated
A new five-month (Oct 21 - Feb 22) survey has found that those who refused to get the COVID-19 shots reported less instances of COVID-19 hospitalizations, contesting the state narrative that “the unvaccinated are overwhelming the health system.”
The survey, led by a team from the Alliance from Natural Health International, compiled self-reported data from an unvaccinated cohort of 18,497 participants. The responses revealed various interesting findings, one of which was a 0.4% hospitalization rate, compared to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) estimate of a 0.6% hospitalization rate for the U.S. population.
“Overall, the survey findings suggest there is no adequate basis on which to suggest the CGC [Control Group Cooperative] cohort and, by extension, other health-aware populations who have elected to avoid COVID-19 injections, have represented a disproportionate burden on health systems compared with those who have received one or more injections,” says the study.
Other findings include 3 out of 4 respondents reporting self-treatment with Vitamins D and C, zinc, quercetin, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, though Vitamin D was the most common.
Around 40% of the respondents reported mental health issues during the five-month survey period, which may be connected to the high rates of hate and victimization felt by the respondents in their own countries.
Between 20%-50% of the respondents reported being the targets of hatred and discrimination in their societies for their healthcare choice, most prevalently in Southern Europe and South America and less in Western Asia and Southern Africa.
The respondents also reported being targets of hatred from their own state governments, most strongly in Southern Europe (61%), Western Europe (59%), Australia and New Zealand (57%), and South America (57%).
“In this specific cohort that has placed more trust in the human immune system than in novel ‘genetic vaccines’, the mental health burden may be associated more to the human response to the pandemic, rather than psychological, fear-based reactions to any threat posed by the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself,” wrote the authors. “This includes discrimination in the workplace, by peers or by family members, as well as victimisation by states (governments/health authorities) owing to ‘unvaccinated’ status.”
Other findings included reports of menstrual changes and “bleeding abnormalities” among women, which may be related to COVID-19, as well as the stress and lifestyle changes forced by governments.
The authors concluded that “the survey data do offer indicative or suggestive evidence that the CGC COVID-19 unvaccinated cohort prioritises self-care and has placed very little burden on healthcare systems in respective countries.
“It follows, then, that the marginalisation, stigmatisation, coercion of and discrimination against this population group, one that has not consented to COVID-19 injections, is neither valid nor ethical. Such discrimination and restriction of liberties based on vaccination status may fall foul of relevant national anti-discrimination laws and international treaties, such as the UN’s International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, 1966), which includes fundamental rights to liberty and security of person, freedom of movement, privacy, religion and belief, freedom of expression, and peaceful assembly.”
The CGC is a vaccine-free, citizen-funded, cooperative think tank part of the larger Control Group community, which serves as a support network for the marginalized unvaccinated population. The idea behind the CGC is that the vaccine-free are the world’s control group, and the organization is compiling their health data to compare against the vaccinated.
In fact, CGC members can obtain an ID card from the CGC which identifies them as part of the SARS-CoV-2 control group and says that the member “must not be vaccinated.” The card is available in any language.
“Many members have reported that these ID cards have been successful in allowing travel, preventing forced vaccination (vaccination without informed consent) or avoiding the loss of liberties, such as access to venues otherwise limited to COVID-19-vaccinated individuals,” says the study.