Media continue false claims about injection with ‘Unvaccinated’ documentary
The mainstream media continue to spread false claims about the COVID-19 injections with a recently released documentary by the BBC called “Unvaccinated”. In the documentary, researchers spend a week attempting to convince seven non-injected holdouts to get the shots.
Even before the documentary was aired on July 20th, the media were excitedly declaring victory against the “anti-vaxxers” and their “baseless claims”. In so doing, however, they revealed an alarming ignorance of recent scientific evidence contradicting their claims.
“It can't be trusted. It might damage fertility – or unborn children. It's been 'rushed through' and we're all 'human guinea-pigs'. Oh, and it's 'a plot to depopulate the Earth'. Sound familiar? All are baseless, yet well-worn claims made about the Covid vaccine,” mocked writer Donna Ferguson of the Daily Mail’s Mail on Sunday.
Ferguson can perhaps be forgiven for her false claim about fertility, as the peer-reviewed study showing the vaccine’s damage to male fertility was published the day Ferguson wrote her article.
The study, titled, “Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors,” found that the shot damages male fertility for up to five months following the injection.
But Ferguson never retracted her claim.
Nor did Ferguson include an MIT study published in May showing a 25% uptick in cardiac events directly correlated to the COVID-19 shots, instead misrepresenting the injections as conclusively safe.
Mail on Sunday did not immediately respond to America’s Frontline News’ request for comment on the above studies.
The BBC documentary itself has come under fire for deliberately misleading viewers, as two of the seven “unvaccinated” subjects revealed.
“I feel let down,” shared 43-year-old Vicky Borman in an interview with GBNews. “I went in there to tell everybody why I wasn't vaccinated. I don't think anybody I've spoken to this morning knows the answer to that question.”
“There are a lot of different reasons, which is what we tried to speak to [Prof. Hannah Fry] about, talking about everything from statistics to things we’re seeing in the paper...the list was endless. And at no point do I feel like those questions were actually addressed.”
The subjects were introduced to various researchers in addition to Fry, including Prof. Asma Khalil and Prof. Adam Finn. Khalil and Finn are both employed by Pfizer, though the BBC did not disclose this link to the participants.
“There were many times that I mentioned that my great-grandma was killed by this vaccine and my other grandma had a stroke after hers,” 21-year-old Nazarin Veronica told GBNews, sharing that she also had a close friend who was a vaccine victim. “So that’s not just one person that I’ve seen have an adverse reaction, that’s three people in my circle who I’ve seen have an adverse reaction. So obviously I’m going to be a bit skeptical if I’m watching this happen in front of me. But I feel that they – yeah, they – it was left out. And I was really upset that they didn’t include that.”
Vicky jumped in to say that Nazarin wasn’t the only one who knew vaccine victims; all the participants had stories to tell, but none of them were told.
“Naz isn’t the only person in the house that also has friends or close family members who have either died or had different adverse reactions or side effects,” said Vicky. “Everybody had a story to tell, on a personal level, myself included. But yeah, they were not represented.”
“Sadly we have been misrepresented, as expected,” Nazarin tweeted. “This leaves me no choice but to expose the truth of how those 6 days really went. @BBCTwo If you’re looking to make another biased documentary, re-hire that same editor because they did a great job!”
