Global vaccine messianists - saviors or murderers? Part 2

Messianism
noun
mes·​si·​a·​nism ˈme-sē-ə-ˌni-zəm  mə-ˈsī-ə-, me-
1: belief in a messiah as the savior of humankind
2: religious devotion to an ideal or cause

Blood money
noun
1: money obtained at the cost of another's life
2: money paid (as by a killer or the killer's clan) to the family of a person who has been killed

Table of Contents

1. Introduction to part 2
2. Hospitals and doctors lose their moorings
   a. Creating the impression of serious disease
3. Perverse incentives to protect vaccines
   a. The mighty dollar vs the Hippocratic Oath
   b.  A Faustian bargain? The blood price of COVID relief funds
   c. Guilty?
4. The crime of battery
5. Ethical medical professionals tell their stories
6. Who's profiteering?

1. Introduction to part 2

In this series, Frontline News (FN) delves into the motivation behind the global vaccine messianists' vigilance in maintaining the COVID-19 narrative and the never-ending COVID-19 vaccine campaign.

In part 1 FN reflected on the stance taken by the vaccine messianists who have appointed themselves the sole arbiters of mis- and dis-information and have been stifling any scientific debate on the topic, even as the vaccines have been proven dangerous and ineffective, and asked the question — “why?”.

FN considered the contention, voiced by Kevin Bass, M.S., a 7th-year M.D./Ph.D. student at a Texas medical school, that while the privileged elites have blood on their hands because of the deadly consequence of their COVID-19 policies, the deaths happened because they “failed to understand that critics from outside of their social class could possibly hold a valid point of view, . . . a result of hubris — believing that anyone not of their caliber couldn't have a valid opinion.” The CDC, WHO, and FDA, he stated, repeatedly overstated the evidence and misled the public and the scientific community fell in lockstep with them.

Reviewing previous articles and studies, FN showed that these same messianists knew the inexpensive and repurposed drugs they were vilifying were beneficial since they were the ones who performed the studies; the expensive drugs they were promoting had harmful, even fatal effects (not “side” effects); the COVID-19 vaccines they had not yet rolled out were expected to cause serious harms and deaths; and indeed, they were the cause of catastrophic injuries and deaths once injected into millions of arms.

FN then asked — is it hubris or is it something else?

Now FN delves into the motivation of hospital administrators and their doctors to keep the “messianists' murder machine” in high gear.

2. Hospitals and doctors lose their moorings

Then, I watched as every policy, practice, and quality metric that makes a trauma and surgical program have good patient outcomes be undermined or abandoned by my colleagues and hospital administration.  I filed countless complaints to our quality department for disgusting breaches of care that were now becoming commonplace.  I could not turn my back on my oaths taken to advocate for patients.  Between mid-2020-2021, following a leak of information from the opaque administration, I learned that our unanticipated morbidity and mortality numbers had more than doubled for indexed trauma patients.  It was horribly demoralizing to watch.

    Dr. James Miller, in his substack published by A Midwestern Doctor^[1]

At the most basic level, many hospitals and doctors are treating patients not according to what's best for them, but according to government protocols.

Incentivized (aka bribed) with COVID-19 care relief funds distributed by federal and state governments, hospitals demanded that their doctors treat persons labeled COVID-19 patients according to a “standard of care” promoted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) that has nothing to do with proper, individualized, medical treatment, but with a “money-making” one-size-fits-all plan. In fact, the more ill the patient becomes the more money is provided for their care. (Hospitals and medical schools regularly receive millions of dollars in grants from the NIH.^[2])

Complicit hospitals and doctors pose a grave danger to the many who walk through their doors, as they seem to have lost their ability to differentiate between right and wrong.

a. Creating the perception of serious disease

     i. Calling all illnesses COVID

Calling all illnesses COVID has been very lucrative. Hospitals that had over 100 admissions by April 10, 2020, received an initial $10 billion from government COVID-19 assistance programs.^[3] Another $10 billion in federal funding was distributed in July 2020 among more than 1,000 hospitals that had at least one of the following, between Jan. 1 and June 10:^[4]

• Over 161 COVID-19 admissions
• At least one COVID-19 admission per day
• COVID-19 admissions per bed that were greater than the national average ratio

     ii. Calling all deaths COVID deaths

Immense pressure was put on doctors to list COVID-19 as the cause of death on death certificates, regardless of the real cause. Minnesota senator and family practitioner Dr. Scott Jensen was quoted on the impact of this directive by Foundation for Economic Freedom (FEE) Managing Director Jon Miltmore in his April 2020 article.^[5]‍

Hospital administrators might well want to see COVID-19 attached to a discharge summary or a death certificate. Why? Because if it's a straightforward, garden-variety pneumonia that a person is admitted to the hospital for—if they're Medicare—typically, the diagnosis-related group lump sum payment would be $5,000, . . . [b]ut if it's COVID-19 pneumonia, then it's $13,000, and if that COVID-19 pneumonia patient ends up on a ventilator, it goes up to $39,000. (Emphasis added)

Miltmore elaborated on the consequences:

By creating a massive federal program that links goosed Medicare payments to COVID-19 treatments, the feds incentivized hospitals to add COVID-19 to diagnostic lists and death certificates. It also incentivized hospitals to get patients on ventilators, which may have done more harm than good, as hospitals have reported unusually high fatality rates for COVID-19 patients on ventilators. (Emphasis added)

In discussion with Jordan Peterson (below), Dr. Jensen explains what it means to “adjust” (falsify) death certificates.^[6]

Calling everything COVID, as Jensen told Peterson, served to increase the perceived danger of the illness.

It also created/perpetuated the demand for vaccines.

For more information:

• CDC quietly publishes the REAL Covid-19 death toll: Only 9,210 Americans died FROM Covid-19 - The rest had other serious illnesses
• Ontario death count includes people who didn't die of COVID-19, but exactly how many is unknown
• Vaccination in Israel: Challenging mortality figures?
• The CDC is Being Called Out for Covid-19 ‘Statistical Manipulation’ as Lawmakers Press for Grand Jury Investigation
• How lethal is Covid-19 REALLY? Why massive fatality rates from Italy are MISLEADING

     iii. Disinforming the public

Claiming that fairly empty ICU units were overwhelmed was a tactic used by hospital administrators to disinform the public about the severity of the illness and, ultimately, increase demand for vaccines.

The hospital forced upon us a narrative that was pure lunacy and contrary to all available observations and previously available data.  A chilling example is the following: I was working a shift in the ICU in late April 2020 and had basically nothing to do because greater than half our beds were empty.  We were “low censusing” any nurses willing to go home because there were so few sick patients.  I was having a cup of coffee, chatting with the staff and another ICU physician, who was in leadership, when the daily newspaper was delivered.  Prior to the paper being delivered, we were all relaxed, jocular, and noting how little work we all had.  The other ICU physician picked up the local paper where the main headline said, ‘Local ICU Overwhelmed.’  The article was referencing our ICU, as we were the only hospital in the county.  He looked at me, started sweating, panicked, and said, “What are we going to do? We may not be able to handle this!”  I replied with, “Pour another cup of coffee and laugh at the morons writing the paper.”  He became visibly distressed and left to call the hospital administration about the situation, who confirmed they were complicit with the newspaper article. This colleague was one of the medical directors of our ICU. Our hospital and ICU were not overfull at the peak number of infections in March 2020. In fact, the ICU was never overfull, even after the horrible protocols that hurt so many patients were established. I knew we were in serious trouble as a medical community when clinical leaders started believing the words in a newspaper and hospital administrators more than their own eyes and experience. (Emphasis added)

    Dr. James Miller^[7]

Missouri Baptist Medical Center hospital administrators also chose to disinform the public, claiming that its largely empty ICU unit was overflowing. As Gateway Pundit writer Ben Wetmore reported in September 2021:^[8]

Another COVID whistleblower has come forward as exclusively reported by Gateway Pundit to allege that the statistics about ICU’s being overrun are wildly inflated, over-reported, and in many cases an outright LIE by political officials.

Whistleblower Josh worked in facilities management at Missouri Baptist Medical Center or “MBMC”, “I watched our hospital administrators say in the media that our intensive care units were overflowing with COVID patients, at 98% capacity, knowing that it was a complete and utter lie.”

THIS MISSOURI HOSPITAL NEVER HAD 98% ICU OCCUPANCY, ADMINISTRATORS LIED TO UNCRITICAL MEDIA

Josh relates that the MBMC hospital, part of a larger $5.5 billion annual network within the Barnes Jewish hospital system in St. Louis, Missouri, actually shut down three out of four floors of intensive care during COVID because they were UNUSED.

HOSPITAL SHUT DOWN ICU FLOORS, DRAMATICALLY REDUCING CAPACITY

“And even after shutting down three-fourths of our ICU capacity, they were still never more than 50% full with that drastically reduced overall capacity. These medical systems that are saying they are overrun with COVID patients are likely LYING TO THE PUBLIC,” Josh said.

3. Perverse incentives to protect vaccines

. . . I was reported to the State Medical Board by an outpatient pharmacist for prescribing a 2-week course of Fluvoxamine (an anti-depressant) prescription to help a patient recovering after COVID. This prescription had been banned by the Washington State Medical Association as a treatment for COVID or its repercussions.  Incidentally, the patient had a positive response and near complete recovery from her illness, but the pharmacist and WSMA didn’t seem to care about that data point but were apparently offended that I violated their protocol.

    Dr. James Miller^[9]

In tandem with incentives to overdiagnose COVID-19 and unnecessarily ventilate patients, hospitals and doctors received “incentives” to prescribe particular medications for COVID-19 patients while disallowing other medications. The real purpose behind authorities delegitimizing drugs proven effective against COVID-19, as FN previously reported, was to protect the development and roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines.

Had the FDA approved hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, two inexpensive off-patent medications with a long history of safe and effective use, for Covid-19, then they would not have been able to authorize or approve any vaccine. Vaccines are reserved for illnesses for which there is no other “FDA approved” remedy. (Emphasis added)

Drugs given emergency use authorization are not FDA-approved drugs, FN explained, and don't prevent the FDA from authorizing or approving the use of vaccines. This distinction cleared the way for “new” drugs, such as Gilead Science's remdesivir, to be given emergency use authorization. Remdesivir (sold under the brand name Velklury), which costs about $3,000 per treatment, was already known to cause kidney and liver damage; it had to be removed from an Ebola drug trial because it killed more people than Ebola.

Gilead funded, in part, the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel and the research promoting remdesivir. Seven members of the Treatment Guidelines Panel had financial ties to Gilead and the company received $70 million of taxpayer money and $34.5 million from the Department of Defense to develop and test remdesivir for COVID-19.^[10] The NIH regularly receives millions of dollars in donations from pharma, including from Gilead Science

The chart below, by AJ DePriest, included in her August 2022 report for Tennessee think tank, TN Liberty Network,^[11] emphasizes the striking difference in costs between NIH-approved COVID-19 treatments and those of the FLCCC's I-CARE protocols, as well as other remedies found effective against COVID-19.

For more information:

• A Tale of Two Drugs: Money vs. Medical Wisdom
• Endogenous Deficiency of Glutathione as the Most Likely Cause of Serious Manifestations and Death in COVID-19 Patients
  

a. The mighty dollar vs the Hippocratic Oath

. . . Even when [unvaccinated] patients did make it to the hospital, I learned that the physicians and staff in the emergency room were directed to provide a lower tier of medicine to this group of patients.  It was less than acceptable, and worse, less dignified, than the care given to any other patients pre and post COVID.  I had to verify with physician leaders that they approved of this inhumanity.  I found out that all the major healthcare systems in the county had agreed to this action, and drove the creation of the policies that demanded physicians act in direct opposition to their oaths.  After discovering this, I departed from the medical community in spirit.

         Dr. James Miller^[12]

b.  A Faustian bargain? The blood price of COVID relief funds

Detailing the tragic consequences of incentivizing NIH-approved COVID-19 treatments, DePriest explained that^[13]

[f]ederal Covid relief funds flooding our hospitals are the carrot and the stick. Their blood-price is strict compliance to requirements and protocols dictated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).4

American hospitals are making money off Covid diagnoses and deadly treatment protocols, and they are immune from all liability if they employ deadly protocols recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the NIH. Therefore, hospitals tell patients and their families there is only one treatment protocol available for Covid. No other “off-label” treatments, despite their effectiveness and safety, pay dividends for every patient. No other treatment offers immunity from liability in case of injury or death. Since early 2020, “covered countermeasures” are the hospitals’ rule—no exceptions.

. . .

The Dangers of “Covered Countermeasures”

When patients enter hospitals and are suspected of having Covid, they become prisoners—medically kidnapped and isolated from families. Hospitals ignore powers of attorney and explicit written and verbal insistence from patients and families not to administer decision-altering sedatives and deadly Remdesivir and not to put patients on ventilators. Hospital staff sedate patients without consent and, with no personal advocate present, administer toxic doses of Remdesivir, leading to acute renal failure and pulmonary edema, followed by ventilators until death occurs. (Emphases added)

For more information:

• How the US COVID treatment protocol maximized hospital admissions and deaths
• How the NIH maximizes COVID hospitalizations by not recommending anti-inflammatories

c. Guilty?

     i. Sarasota Memorial Hospital (SMH)

SMH, a public Florida hospital, demanded that its doctors only treat patients according to incentivized government protocols, which include remdesivir and other new COVID treatments. According to its 2023 COVID pandemic response report praising the hospital's response to COVID-19:^[14],[15]

• SMH was one of a few hospitals that benefited from an FDA-approved expanded access program for Gilead's

• remdesivir. While they received no reimbursement for expenses incurred, they were able to get their hospitalized COVID patients early access to the medication at a time, they claimed, when there were very limited treatment options.
• SMH collaborated with the Mayo Clinic in a program that gave patients access to convalescent plasma before the FDA had granted it emergency use authorization. The hospital received no compensation for the $120,000 it cost the hospital to participate in the program but received $200 per patient to offset data collection expenses.
• SMH also ran three large clinical trials of Regeneron's monoclonal antibodies, for which the hospital received $2.2 million; their expenses totaled over $1 million. [Regeneron's drug, Regen-Cov, came with an FDA warning that it could possibly interfere with your body's ability to fight off a future COVID-19 infection or with its response to a COVID-19 vaccine.^[16]
• The hospital received special funding through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Security (CARES) Act, partial expense reimbursement for added costs of caring for COVID patients, part loan, and part additional claims reimbursement of 20% for COVID Medicare patients. In November 2020 an add-on for new COVID treatments was approved, which included remdesivir.
• SMH denied being incentivized not to use FDA drugs off-label. ^[17]some text
  • SMH also gave $500 to each employee who was fully vaccinated by October 1, 2021. SMH received the vaccines for free and was reimbursed for administering them.^[18]
  some text
  • Moshe Frank interviews Moshe Rubashkin, son of Coronavirus victim[s] speaks about hospitals now
    (A more accurate title would be “Moshe Frank interviews Moshe Rubashkin, son of hospital victims speaks out”. Unlike Diane whose husband became too weak to leave on his own, Rubashkin was told he could remove his mother against medical advice (his father had already died there), which he did via private ambulance. She, too, was too weak to leave on her own.)
  • Making a killing documentary
  • Massive lawsuit: Scott Schara Files Landmark Suit against Catholic Hospital for Murder of His Special Needs Daughter, Grace
  some text
  • Dr. Kat Lindley in an interview with The Epoch Times's American Thought Leaders host Jan Jakielek explains why she left the hospital system:^[24]
  some text
  • Dr. Jensen explains to Peterson, in the interview below, his motivation for continuing to speak out as he has, despite the personal cost:
  some text
  • When pulmonary nurse Albert Spence realized, to his horror, that the unusual COVID-19 protocols he was told to follow were killing his patients, he left the profession. Listen to his riveting testimony before the South Carolina State Legislature on “therapeutic options” for COVID-19:^[25]
  some text
  • Dr. Paul Marik was a successful critical care doctor until he started saving his COVID patients. The following is excerpted from an interview with Dr. Joseph Mercola; Dr. Marik discussed his medical expertise, his awakening to medical fraud, and the position he finds himself in now, as a result of his hospital's unethical and amoral COVID-19 protocols.^[26]
  some text
  • Dr. James Miller (quoted above) was practically forced out of medicine in the State of Washington. He packed up his home and moved to Florida, where he ultimately resumed working as a physician in a setting in which he could properly care for patients.^[27] Dr. Miller spoke with Fox and Friends First host Todd Piro about the substandard care unvaccinated patients received in his and area hospitals and the group loss of reason and cruelty that he saw among those who had been his friends and colleagues.^[28]
  some text
  • If Covid vaccine refusers are turned away at hospitals and doctor offices, is that ethical?
  • The Doctor Will See You Now—Wait, Not You
  • Medical ethicists criticize doctors refusing to treat the unvaccinated
  • It’s a Terrible Idea to Deny Medical Care to Unvaccinated People
  • ‘We had no idea’: Unvaccinated B.C. doctor stuns patients over COVID-19 beliefs
    (A Canadian Provincial Health Order forbade unvaccinated doctors from practicing medicine, even by telehealth.)
  • Hear Me Out: Pediatricians Speak the Truth
  some text
  • COVID-19 and our culture of vaccines
  • Why is Emergency Use Authorization being used to increase big pharma coffers with no regard for patient safety?
  • Saving children or saving the vaccine program?

     ii. SMH board meeting shenanigans

As a public hospital, SMH's board members are elected by the city's residents and the public has the right to be present and speak at board meetings. As Chris Nelson and Nanette Holt writing for The Epoch Times emphasized, the hospital packed the board meeting with hospital personnel in an attempt to prevent the public from entering and expressing their opinions. It was only after hospital personnel had their say and left that there was room for members of the public to enter and speak.^[19]

This is some of what transpired at SMH's board meeting on February 21, 2023, which led to the approval of its COVID pandemic response report.

     iii. Patient deaths at SMH

Nelson and Holt spoke with family members of SMH patients who died in the hospital.  

. . . They blamed the use of ventilators and the drug remdesivir for the deaths of their loved ones.

Cynthia Schrock told of how she begged SMH to consider using alternative treatments for her husband, Eric, for COVID-19.

“I asked for ivermectin and was told “This hospital does not give ivermectin,” Schrock said.

She also begged to visit her love.

“In the 22 days he was in there, I was never allowed in to see him,” she said. “They  absolutely refused.”

[A year later, an independent review of her husband's medical records revealed that he actually died from a three-week undiagnosed heart attack.^[20]]

Wendy Cohen, who attended the meeting, was angry for the same reason. She told The Epoch Times that her brother-in-law, William Ackerly, died at SMH.

“It was three weeks of pure hell,” Cohen said. “He was admitted on July 23. We, from Day One, asked for ivermectin. He was completely healthy. They gave him remdesivir, and he was dead by Aug. 16.

“My sister, his wife, was here trying to get in every day. They never let her in to see him except one day when they tried to talk her into signing a DNR [Do Not Resuscitate order]. That was when they let her in. He was already on a ventilator, at that time, and it was too late.”

Cohen said she believes doctors knew remdesivir damages kidneys, but prescribed it anyway.

“They put money before lives,” she said.

But she believes “doctors’ hands were tied,” she said. Administrators who enforced the use of ineffective, even harmful, treatments are the ones who should be held accountable, she said.

(Emphasis added)

     iv. University of Pennsylvania Medical Center (UPMC)

Diane shared her story about the ways in which UPMC killed her husband Rich on the Protocol Kills website.^[21] She told the complete story about her husband's original illness, why he allowed himself to be hospitalized, and what they did to him once he was admitted until he died. In the section titled “Drugged”, she wrote:

The doctors chanted daily “You are going to need mechanical ventilation” which he refused.  When he realized that they weren’t going to treat his virus he tried to leave but couldn’t because of his severe weakness, malnutrition and sedation.  They tied and mitted his hands to the railings of his bed and sedated him deeper with several suppressants claiming he was refusing medical treatment.

The night before the ventilator surgery he was beyond making any kind of decisions.  The hospital gave my husband over 50 drugs including Haldol, Ativan, Precedex, Morphine, Remeron, and Propofol in the same evening.  He was drugged and moved to the ICU, where against our wishes he was vented.

In the next to last section titled “Lies And Cover Up” Diane summed up what she discovered about her husband's death after she received and read his hospital records. The report, totaling 2,338 pages, was not in chronological order forcing her to read it  3 times in order to piece together what happened to him. This is her summation:

The “UPMC hospital drs” starved and tortured, tranquilized and paralyzed and poisoned my husband to death without ever treating the virus or the sepsis he had upon arrival to the ER. They killed my husband through malnutrition, negligence, malpractice and unnecessary and poisonous drug administration which made him defenseless against a virus and bacterial infections that overtook his body.

In the last section titled “Choosing Murder to Keep a Job”, she continued:

I called one ICU nurse after I learned all this from the records.  She and I spoke for over 2 hours where she conveyed the stress, misery and malpractice that she witnessed to the point in time where she had decided to change careers.  She said she experienced the very same tragedy with her best friend whose father was of the same age in the same hospital as my husband.  “Please don’t blame the doctors” she said, “it was the protocol we had to follow or be fired”. (Emphasis added)

Diane concluded:

I’ve learned through incessant research the pharmaceutical industry paid off our governmental officials in collusion with wealthy investors who would profit from an endless forced vaccine program.  We must expose them for justice - They must repent for what they’ve done to those they harmed, tortured and murdered.

>> Can doctors' hands really be tied?

>>If the doctors and nurses were told to use a gun instead of lethal drugs and dangerous ventilators or be fired, would they have? Is there a difference?

>>“Following orders” wasn't an acceptable defense at the Nuremberg trials and it shouldn't be acceptable now. (Let's not forget that horrendous experiments on victims were performed by doctors.)

For more information:

4. The crime of battery

The crime of forcing unwanted medical treatments on patients was the topic that Attorney Thomaz Renz spoke about at a Truth for Health Foundation conference held at the end of October 2021, as reported by David McLoone for LifeSite News.^[22] He quoted Renz who explained, that according to the law,

[f]or a medic to force treatment onto a patient of sound mind who has refused to receive what is being offered constitutes battery, Renz noted. “That is absolutely a battery under about any law that I can think of.”

Renz thus stated that the continual use of remdesivir and mechanical ventilation, often against the express wishes of patients, opens up criminal cases for “intentional torts . . . batteries and . . . wrongful death, among others,” all being committed “under the guise of treatment.”

“The hospital doesn’t have the right to force you into something you don’t want. . . . We’ve got to take a stand.”

With death rates linked to the NIH protocol as high as 85 percent, the attorney said that it would be impossible for the hospitals to be ignorant of the correlation. “They clearly know this [protocol] is a death sentence, and you need to say no to the [ventilators] and you need to fight these hospitals.”

Similar to Diane's story above, Nicole Riggs, whose father died in the hospital, poured over his medical records for a year, trying to piece together what happened to him, and discovered that he had been given 50 different drugs, denying him the vitamin C, zinc, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine, that they had requested. In speaking with Liz Collins about her father's death in the hospital (below), she stated her belief that if he had been treated for regular pneumonia instead of FDA/NIH protocols for COVID pneumonia, he would be alive today.^[23]  

5. Ethical medical professionals tell their stories

I decided to step out of that system and I actually practice independently. I do direct primary care and it’s an affordable membership fee. It’s just me and a patient. There’s no middleman. They can call me and text me 24/7. When I travel, I’m accessible. If they need to come to my office, they come to the office. But it’s really just that one-on-one relationship and there’s nothing in between us.

. . .

[P]hysicians have lost their autonomy. For the past 10, 15 years, big hospital systems have been acquiring physicians’ practices and big specialty practices, and you then practice what I call the corporate practice of medicine. When you are in the system, whichever the system is, you have to get the labs from the hospital that you work at or whoever they contract with.

You send your patients to the specialist that they have a contract with. You live within that network and you get incentivized or you can lose some money and incentives if you don’t do certain things. You get dictated to by this way of medicine. . . .

There’s a protocol that gets initiated the moment a patient enters the doors. Because if you do everything by the protocol, then the hospital hits all of those right numbers, all of those right check boxes, so they get paid the most amount of money they can get paid.

(Emphasis added)

. . . You can understand the situation that I was in. I was the director of the ICU. I had run the ICU for 15 years and now I was told I can't use safe and effective drugs to treat my patients. Rather, I must use a toxic drug [remdesivir] for which the hospital gets an additional bonus. That was a big awakening for me and it basically speaks to the depth, the breadth of corruption. Basically, the health care system is not patient-geared or health care-geared or geared to enlighten patients, improve their health, improve their lifespan, make them happy and improve their general health. The system is designed to make money. Simple as that. Make money for Big Pharma. Make money for the hospitals and the system and therefore empower the NIH.

. . .

“They reported me to the National Practitioner Data Bank. When you get reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank, your name is there forever, and it makes it almost impossible to get a license again in any state. The hospital essentially ended my career based on fraud, falsification of data, deceit, dishonesty, and unethical behavior.

“And here I had data to prove that in my ICU, under my care, the mortality was at least half that of my colleagues. That was irrelevant. They had to get rid of me because I was challenging the system. Essentially, I was forced to resign because they have enormous power and influence … That essentially ended my career.”

(Emphases added)

For more information:

6. Who's profiteering?

In part 3, FN will focus on those behind the the protocols and vaccine campaign, profiteering from their “murder machine”.

Related articles by Caryn Lipson

‍